Tuesday, April 03, 2007

More awards the Enquirer didn't win

For business coverage, from the Society of American Business Editors and Writers. The Enquirer business section today reported a story that had been in the Cincinnati Business Courier on Friday. If the story was important enough to play across the top of the Business page, then it should have been important enough to get into the paper in a more timely manner.

5 Comments:

Blogger Nasty, Brutish & Short said...

But if you put the news in right away, then it's obvious you got it from another source!

Seriously, I think that's the logic.

5:50 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Lovely NEWS... check it out and offer opinions...

http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070404/NEWS01/304030027

8:43 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Can the Enquirer exploit, broadcast humiliation or further embarrass this man and his family any more for the cause of getting a click for 20-some cent ad?

And who cares about Liz Carroll and her pitiful 10 buck plight?

Can there be something interesting and SUBSTANTIAL in the local paper and website? Things I know... I can go anywhere to get news and, I will NEVER buy a window from C*, or furniture from F* F* (again) or shop at K* (again).

If the paper and cincinnati.com can't give me REAL news, I will patronize those who choose not to advertise in a sleazy rag... choices are wonderful for everyone.

8:55 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I liked Dan Horn's story: “I was a liar, a thief, a cheat"

It was real and human. I give the Enquirer a ba-zillon thumbs up for doing a good job on this. Thanks Dan!

Anyone going to do something great tomorrow? Or maybe the next day...

12:37 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Did you notice that an article from Forbes exposing Cintas's "Dirty Laundry" got nominated?

2:51 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home